Forth issue of the existing UHMWPE ski base types is their low and uneven capacity to take and hold other substances as gliding ski waxes and agents.
How it works?
Only sintered ski base types have sufficiently long chains to create free space to take wax molecules on the very top surface and inside the bulk material.
On the very top surface we call the free spaces “flokati carpet” which are fibres or hairs several hundred nanometers long which are covering the entire ski base surface. Between these fibres is enough space for wax molecules get in and get stuck here. Most wax molecules are allocated here.
In bulk similar free cavities do exist because the bulk material consists of intertwined molecular chains. It is estimated that wax can penetrate the ski base up to 1 micrometer, thus 1000 nanometers, the deeper you go, the less wax molecules you will - however - find.
Both free spaces in flokati carpet on the very top surface and free cavities inside the bulk material are ca. tens of nanometers large which means there is enough space for wax molecules but...
If we connect this knowledge about size and distribution of free spaces or cavities in the flokati carpet on the very top surface and in the bulk material of the ski base with the knowledge about how especially competetion skis are prepared (several basic wax layers applied as hot appoach, gliding layers applied as block waxes or powder waxes, top coats applied as liquids or sprays), we need to see / understand that the spatial capacity of free spaces and cavities which was available at the very beginning of the ski service process is consumed very fast and each new layer applied on the ski base creates more and more complex mixture than a new layer.
If we combine these types of knowledge about size and distribution of free spaces or cavities in the ski base and about competition ski service processes with the chemical interaction between PE / carbon black as main material components of the ski base on the one side with waxes and wax-based gliding agents on the other side (chemical bonds between ski base and waxes are extremely weak and waxes need to rely on mechanical retention inside the ski base) it must be absolutely clear to us that existing services processes in combination with existing ski base types cannot create any relyable / repeatable and controlable results.
Combination of the existing ski base types and existing ski service processes cannot result in relyable / repeatable and controlable gliding features on the ski base.