Zobrazují se příspěvky se štítkemcarbon black. Zobrazit všechny příspěvky
Zobrazují se příspěvky se štítkemcarbon black. Zobrazit všechny příspěvky

pondělí 3. srpna 2026

Effect of Ski Base Material on Structure Quality - Part No. 2

 The Importance of Dimensional Stability in Wet Conditions

Some ski base manufacturers consider dimensional stability to be one of the decisive material properties, particularly for bases intended for warm and wet snow conditions.

In colder conditions, contact occurs predominantly between the ski base and individual ice grains, whose surfaces are covered by a very thin quasi-liquid layer, referred to as the QLL. At the points of actual contact, this layer can act as a highly effective boundary lubricant.

As snow temperature and moisture increase, or as a result of frictional heating, an additional and substantially thicker layer of free water may form in the contact zone. This can be described as a secondary water film.

Under certain conditions, a thin and discontinuous layer of water can reduce friction. Once the secondary water film becomes excessively thick and continuous, however, and is not removed from the contact zone quickly enough, its effect changes. Compared with the very thin QLL on the surface of the ice grains, it may no longer function as an effective lubricant, and other adverse tribological phenomena begin to dominate. These include capillary and suction forces, a substantial increase in the real contact area, viscous resistance during the displacement and shearing of water, non-uniform pressure distribution within the water film, and hydrodynamic losses associated with changes in flow direction and local turbulence.

The ski base structure plays a fundamental role in limiting these adverse effects of the secondary water film. Its purpose is not merely to reduce the contact area mechanically, but also to create a system of grooves and channels that captures, guides and removes water from the contact zone as quickly as possible.

For the structure to perform this function effectively, it must retain the geometry in which it was designed and produced. This remains true when the structure operates in combination with glide waxes or other surface treatments.

If its grooves deform, flatten or partially close under load, their cross-section, depth and water-drainage capacity change. The structure may then cease to function in the way for which it was originally designed.

The requirement for dimensional stability is particularly important in alpine skiing. At high speeds and under substantial dynamic loads, for example in a sharp turn, the ski is subjected to significant loading that is often concentrated on one side.

A soft and elastic ski base may yield locally under this pressure. The geometry of individual grooves can therefore change precisely when they are required to remove the greatest amount of water. A reduction in groove depth or cross-section may restrict water flow and increase the proportion of the secondary water film within the contact zone.

For this reason, some ski bases intended for warm conditions and alpine disciplines have a modulus of elasticity of approximately 950 to 1,050 MPa, equivalent to 0.95 to 1.05 GPa.

A higher E-modulus means that the material undergoes less elastic deformation under the same load. The structure therefore retains its original shape, groove depth and functional cross-section more effectively, even under high local loads.

The E-modulus value cannot, however, be assessed in isolation. It also depends on the measurement temperature, the test method used, the loading rate, specimen orientation, and whether the manufacturer reports a tensile, compressive or flexural modulus. Direct comparison of different ski bases therefore requires values obtained using the same test method and under comparable conditions.

Stiffness and Wear Resistance

Higher stiffness does not automatically imply a longer ski base service life.

The exceptional abrasive wear resistance of pure UHMWPE is related, among other factors, to its high toughness, elasticity and extremely long, entangled polymer chains. When exposed to an abrasive particle, an ice grain or another surface irregularity, the material can partially yield elastically without a fragment being immediately detached.

Adding a rigid reinforcing component limits deformation of the matrix and increases its dimensional stability. At the same time, however, local stresses may become concentrated around the particles.

If the amount, type or dispersion of the filler is unsuitable, the polymer matrix may be damaged around the particles, which can gradually loosen and be pulled out, causing the surface to crumble. Increased dimensional stability may therefore come at the cost of higher abrasive wear.

In simplified terms, pure UHMWPE absorbs part of the load through elastic deformation, whereas a stiffer composite material deforms less but may be more susceptible to local damage and particle separation.

There is therefore a trade-off between dimensional stability, machining quality, toughness and wear resistance.

The optimum ski base material need not be either the softest or the hardest. Its composition and internal structure must allow it to deform as little as possible during grinding, permit clean material separation, produce a minimum of unwanted fibres, retain the geometry of the structure under load, and at the same time preserve sufficient toughness and wear resistance.

The quality of the resulting structure is therefore determined not only by the grinding stone and machine settings. It is also significantly influenced by the design of the ski base material itself: the properties of the UHMWPE matrix, the type and quantity of added particles, their size and structure, the quality of their dispersion, and the course of the sintering process.

The same structure produced with the same grinding stone may therefore not have the same geometry, cleanliness or function on different materials. The ski base material is not merely a passive carrier of the structure. It actively determines how accurately the structure can be produced, how clean its surface will be, and to what extent it will retain its geometry under actual loading during skiing.

 

neděle 2. srpna 2026

Hand or Rotary Brush - That Is the Question? Part. No. 1

Hand or Rotary Brush - That Is the Question?

To understand the fundamental differences between hand brushing and rotary brushing when removing excess wax from the surface of a ski base, we must first describe how wax is deposited on the base and how it interacts with the base material.

1. Three Types of Wax Reservoir in the Ski Base

After hot waxing, the wax is not present on the ski base as a single homogeneous layer. To assess the effect of brushing, it is useful to distinguish three basic reservoirs.

1.1. Macroscopic Excess Wax

The first reservoir consists of a continuous wax layer above the surface of the ski base and wax filling the ground structure.

This layer is predominantly a processing surplus. It covers the structure, may increase friction and restrict water drainage. It should therefore be removed with a plastic scraper followed by brushing.

1.2. Thin Film in the Surface Microstructure

The second reservoir consists of a very thin wax film adhering:

  • to the peaks and walls of the ground structure,
  • in fine grooves and surface defects,
  • between UHMWPE fibrils and microscopic surface irregularities.

This layer is no longer merely a coarse excess and may contribute to the frictional and wetting properties of the ski base.

This is precisely where the difficult-to-define boundary lies between the desirable removal of excess wax and the undesirable removal of functional wax.

1.3. Wax Absorbed in the Uppermost UHMWPE Layer

The third reservoir consists of wax that, when heated, penetrated into the uppermost polymer zone of the ski base.

UHMWPE is not porous like a sponge. It is a semicrystalline polymer, and wax can penetrate primarily into its amorphous regions, interphase spaces and surface defects.

This wax cannot simply be 'brushed out' of intact polymer. It may, however, be removed together with the uppermost UHMWPE layer if the brush begins to wear it mechanically.

2. How a Fine Hand-Held Steel Brush Removes Wax

As a reference hand brush, we will assume:

  • a wire diameter of approximately 0.12 mm,
  • a wire length of approximately 25 mm,
  • wires grouped into bundles approximately 8 mm in diameter,
  • slow manual movement along the length of the ski base.

2.1. Basic Mechanism

Under pressure, the long and flexible wire bends, partially lies down in the direction of travel and slides over the surface along a relatively long path.

A hand brush therefore works predominantly by:

  • slow and continuous shear,
  • gradual loosening of particles,
  • mechanical separation of wax from the surface,
  • partial penetration into accessible parts of the structure.

It first removes loose flakes and fragments left after scraping. It then disrupts thinner wax residues by shear and gradually releases them from the walls and upper parts of the grooves.

A single stroke usually does not remove the wax completely. The first pass disrupts or shifts it, the next breaks it into smaller pieces, and subsequent strokes remove it. Hand brushing is therefore a cumulative process.

2.2. Penetration into the Structure

A 0.12 mm wire can enter only sufficiently wide and open grooves. Its actual penetration also depends on:

  • the shape and depth of the structure,
  • wire flexibility,
  • applied pressure,
  • the contact angle,
  • wear of the wire tip.

A long wire has time to conform to the surface, but it often cannot reach into fine, oblique or multi-level structures.

2.3. Effect on the Individual Wax Reservoirs

A hand brush:

  1. removes macroscopic excess very effectively,
  2. gradually reduces the thin film in the microstructure,
  3. does not directly remove absorbed wax from intact UHMWPE.

However, if the steel wire continues to contact the polymer itself, plastic deformation, micro-ploughing, removal of fibrils and a very small abrasive loss of UHMWPE may occur. Wax absorbed in the polymer may then be removed together with the polymer.

2.4. Characteristics of Hand Brushing

A hand brush is a slow and readily controllable tool. The applied pressure, number of strokes and area of action can all be adjusted continuously.

Its main weakness is non-uniformity. Hand pressure, the angle of travel and the number of contacts are not perfectly identical over the entire ski-base surface.


středa 6. května 2026

What are the main weaknesses of the existing UHMWPE ski base types? – Part III.

Third issue of existing UHMWPE ski base types are the fast changes of the ski base surface.

How it works?

We know that the main component of UHMWPE ski base types is PE with extremely long linear molecular chains (normaly 7 to 12 mil. g/mol) which is enriched with different additives where the most important is soot or carbon black.

Even if we speak about PE with extremely high molecular weight and about carbon black as singular material types, we need to understand that there are plenty of PEs and carbon blacks which very different and specific features.

Particular features of PE and carbon black as two main components of modern ski base types define how they interact if processed in sintration. Normally carbon black has low or no chemical interactions with PE matrix leading to pure “sitting” inside the PE matrix. This weak “sitting” of carbon black corns inside the PE matrix results in fast and easy “breaking out” of whole soot corns out of matrix, “breaking off” of soot corn parts or soot corns abrasion on the very top surface. All these processes - breaking out / breaking off / abrasion - result in quite fast microscopic changes of the very top surface. These changes are the faster and more significant, the larger and more complex the very top surface of the ski base is, i.e. complex structure patterns which enlarge the surface multiple times and create complex details accelerate these changes.

Due to very weak chemical interactions between PE matrix and carbon black the very top surface of the ski base is a subject of very fast - even if with the naked eye invisible - microscopic changes which do cause that skiers run on a new ski base surface latest in the next competition.



úterý 3. března 2026

Which components of the ski base are the most important

 

 

Even if specialized magazines and articles mention many different additives and ingredients used in ski bases of competition skis, finally we will find out, if we look in much more detail, that there are only two main components which influence the most important features of each ski base type, especially now after fluor ban.

 

First is the UHMWPE itself which defines the features of the matrix. The matrix itself can get touch in contact with snow surface, that’s the reason why PE is used, because currently there is no other polymer with such a low coefficient of friction and so high hydrophobicity available. With respect to other components the matrix is responsible for the wear resistance and fixation of additives.

 

For wear resistance the most important figure is the length of molecular chains, the higher the length of molecular chains, the better the wear resistance. Reaching the value of 10.000.000 the polymer can be hardly processed.

 

Additive fixation in UHMWPE is problematic. The most additives do not form strong chemical bonds with the base matrix. Additives are bound in the matrix either by very weak chemical bonds or by mechanical retention. Especial close to the surface where the contact snow and ski base surface take place especially the mechanical retention decides.

 

The most important additive used in modern ski base types is soot or carbon black. The importance is given by the amount used in the competition ski base types which reaches up to 20 % of weight fraction in Nordic skis and up to 40 % of weight fraction in Alpine skis and by the way how carbon black is fixed in the PE matrix.

 

Some carbon black is incorporated directly in the PE matrix, but most of carbon black is filling the free space or cavities between the PE corns which are sintered together using heat and pressure. Especially the second type of soot fixation is responsible for high values of E-modulus which decides how ski base changes elastically under load.